Each partner building receives an end-of-year report built from session logs, staff surveys, and student reflections. The figures below come from the 2025–26 reports. We publish what was observed and say plainly where data is still thin.
150 + 43
Group and one-to-one sessions
Across seven buildings
4.3 / 5
Program quality, staff rating
Facilitator effectiveness 4.1 / 5
14
GOAT principles covered per building
Financial literacy, critical thinking, mindset, and more
In one building, a Tier 3 mentoring initiative delivered 33 weekly one-to-one sessions to eight students, integrated with each student's IEP, over a sixteen-week period.
4.0 / 5
Self-regulation
Staff-rated at end of program
4.0 / 5
Attendance
Staff-rated at end of program
5 of 6
Students showed academic growth
Pre/post course averages
Three students closed multiple courses during the period, and four of six were on track to graduate by year end. One teacher described a student as having "improved self-regulation significantly since last year." We note where the sample is small: these are three to eight students, reported honestly.
“I started to focus more in school. The most surprising thing I learned was how smart I actually am.”
“Talk about my feelings more, because at first I used to shut down and build everything up.”
“When you’re going through the struggle you think you’re the only one, but then you find out other people are struggling.”
“The one-on-ones were awesome, learning about myself and other people. I had never had a class like it.”
For 2026–27 every partner building runs the multi-informant executive functioning survey at the start and end of each cycle, so growth is measured on the same items by the same people. Reports go to building leaders and families in plain language.
We will walk you through what a building receives and how the data is collected.
